Kinerk, Schmidt & Sethi, PLLC
Tucson Personal Injury Attorney About Us Attorneys Personal Injury Victories Frequently Asked Questions Contact Us
Call toll-free at (888) 655-4947 or local at (520) 333-6326
Personal Injury Blog
Contact Us
Personal Injury Information
Personal Injury
ATV & Recreational Vehicle Mishaps
Bicycle Accidents
Car Accidents
Construction Accidents
Disfigurement
Dram Shop Act / Alcohol-Caused Injuries
Dog Bites & Animal Attacks
Drunk Driving Accidents
Elder Abuse
Insurance Bad Faith
Medical Malpractice
Motorcycle Accidents
Pedestrian Accidents
Premises Liability
Product Liability / Dangerous Products
Punitive Damages
RSD/CRPS
Sexual Abuse
Swimming Pool Accidents
Truck Accidents
Types of Injuries
Uninsured / Underinsured Motorists
Wrongful Death

Default Judgment May Include Punitive Award Even if Plaintiff Fails to Plead a Specific Amount

Civil Procedure - Default Judgment Awarding Partnership Interest & Punitive Damages

Ezell v Quoun, 585 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 40 (App., Div. I, June 17, 2010) (J. Hall)

WHERE COMPLAINT PLEADS RIGHT TO PARTNERSHIP INTEREST AND PUNITIVE DAMAGES DEFAULT JUDGMENT FOR THESE DAMAGES APPROPRIATE

Plaintiff sued defendant claiming he tortuously breached a partnership agreement and damaged plaintiff. Defendant failed to respond to complaint. Plaintiff filed Notice of Application for Default and the court entered default. The defendant was permitted to appear at the default hearing where compensatory damages, the partnership interest and punitive damages were all awarded to the plaintiff.

Defendant appealed claiming the plaintiff could not acquire punitive damages on default where no specific amount of punitive damages was ever pled. The Court of Appeals disagreed holding a prayer for punitive damages "in an amount to be proven at trial" put the defendant suitably and sufficiently on notice that an award in amount justified by the evidence could be awarded against him. Similarly the court upheld the trial court's award of the partnership interest to the plaintiff finding that the statement in the complaint asking the court to "declare plaintiff has an interest . . . and barring defendant from having any interest" sufficiently notified the defendant that such relief might be granted on default and the award was proper.

Categories: Personal Injury
Accolades & Associations
Kinerk, Schmidt & Sethi, PLLC - Tucson Personal Injury Attorney
Located at 1790 East River Road, Suite 300,
Tucson, AZ 85718.
Phone: (888) 655-4947.
Local: (520) 790-5600.
Website: .
© 2014 All Rights Reserved.
Attorney Web Design

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Site Map | Privacy Policy